Freedom on Screen: Bangladesh's Short Film as Alternative Cinema
The short film plays an outsized role in Bangladesh’s cinematic history. The term “short film” might only signify a film of shorter duration than the average theatrically distributed commercial-industrial film in the mind of a viewer; but in its historical development, social linkages and modes of production lie the hidden narratives of a struggle for self-expression by Bangladeshi filmmakers and audiences. The evolution of the form in Bangladesh reveals the traces of this struggle between filmmakers trying to wrest an autonomous form from the predations of state control. A key aspect in this was the memorialisation of the Liberation Struggle of 1971 as a cultural moment that defined the identity of a country and set the agenda for their political progress. It is not surprising, therefore, to note that the short film came of age in the mid-1980s (when a conservative military dictatorship was in power and committed to reversing the secular, nationalistic gains of the Liberation Struggle). This moment emerged around the nucleus of a controversial film, Agami (Forthcoming, 1984), and as a culmination of several decades of film society movements going back at least to the 1960s, before the formation of Bangladesh. Fahmida Akhter writes,
“These films are committed to adopting strategies different from the practices associated with the mainstream film industry both in stylistic and in economic terms. In order to earn greater freedom on screen, the directors of such films, in most cases, produce and distribute their films by themselves, avoiding the tyrannies of the producers and distributers of commercial films.”
As writers and filmmakers like Tanvir Mokammel have suggested, the temporal distinction is not as significant as the conception of an “alternative” mode of making films for a politically conscious audience, thereby marking Bangladesh’s own contribution to the globally southern discourses of Third Cinema and third world cinema. Mokammel, in fact, suggests the use of the term “muktodoirghor cholochhitro” (free-length film), suggesting the implications of a freedom from temporal linearity or even the poetic liberty of free versifying. These films were identifiable for their form, usually shot on 16mm film, with minimal budgets, so that production values remained low. In an essay in his book Cinema Bhabna (2018), Mokammel rues this: “Bad prints and weak soundtracks were the perpetual lot for short films.” He also hopes, however, that the short film can move beyond its most immediate and identifiable instinct for critical reportage and develop more complex ways of representing the political and social landscapes of a changing nation like Bangladesh. As titles like Agami make it clear however, embodying a hope for the future is another firm characteristic of the short film as alternative cinema in Bangladesh.
To read more about Bangladesh’s cinema, please click here and here.